Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
articles:dshensmith [2026/03/31 08:55] – hjrarticles:dshensmith [2026/03/31 09:04] (current) – hjr
Line 69: Line 69:
  
 So: a TV set deliberately and intentionally installed in a way to //not// receive live TV signals; and a deliberate deletion of the one account I'd need to view streaming content from the BBC: I won't be convicted on either the "installed" or "use" prongs of the Act. So: a TV set deliberately and intentionally installed in a way to //not// receive live TV signals; and a deliberate deletion of the one account I'd need to view streaming content from the BBC: I won't be convicted on either the "installed" or "use" prongs of the Act.
 +
 +In conclusion, Daniel originally mis-stated what the words of the law are. In doubling down on his mis-statement, he limits the application of the law in a way that it's not actually limited to in practice, which is potentially dangerous to his viewers. He clearly doesn't like being corrected or contradicted: his passive-aggressive response to me is indicative of that, at least. But he was wrong and remains so. I've also now blocked his channel on my phone, as it's pointless listening to someone claiming to explain the law when he can't even state it accurately... or spot the nuance and import of how it is actually written.
  • articles/dshensmith.txt
  • Last modified: 2026/03/31 09:04
  • by hjr